searchmetrics email facebook github gplus instagram linkedin phone rss twitter whatsapp youtube arrow-right chevron-up chevron-down chevron-left chevron-right clock close menu search
30193019

Update: Google “Bad” SEO Update – Now named Penguin Update

Google, by way of Matt Cutts, announced some weeks ago that a special SEO over optimization update will come. Now it’s live with its first iteration. Yesterday evening Google also published the article “Another step to reward high-quality sites” with some more insights into the update. Interesting stuff that every SEO should read.  The official goal was “to take care” over-optimized websites, containing too many unnatural links, automated content (spinning), keyword stuffing etc. Google tries to kill webspam altogether. The impact on all keywords queries is about 3.1%, which compared to Panda (with around 12%) is much less. But Google said more short-head/visible keywords should be affected.

What’s definitely new and surprising for me was the day of the update. It’s unusual for Google to make a major update on a Tuesday or Wednesday.  Normally Google makes this kind of update on a Monday or Thursday. That’s why I presume that in the next few days we’ll see more updates and this update is just the beginning.

Update: I updated the data tonight so it is fresh and you’ll see more losers and much better correlations to the Google update. You can also click directly in the table to see more data in the Searchmetrics Essentials.

What happened?

I took nearly a huge set of keywords from short-head to medium and low search volume and looked at the current rankings from position 1 to 100 and compared the rankings to April 20th. In the data were also some glitches from the Panda 3.5 update which was going live from April 19th to 20th, Matt Cutts mentioned. But overall you see a trend of those domains which really lost visibility within the Google Penguin update.

In the data I saw some striking losers, which suggests to me there must have been another update today. There is a pattern in the winners and losers table and I’ll give you some insights below the table. Note I analyzed the visibility, not the overall traffic. The SEO visibility only includes calculation on organic rankings. Direct traffic, Social, PPC etc. is absolutely not included.

List of SEO visibility losers (google.com)

UPDATE: I updated the table (2012-04-26) with more keywords and fresher data.

Domain SEO Visibility Difference in %
songlyrics.com 128186 -128679 -50,10
great-quotes.com 4515 -72248 -94,12
comcast.com 143032 -66286 -31,67
dslreports.com 65264 -63770 -49,42
appbrain.com 100782 -53439 -34,65
hotels-rates.com 16868 -43554 -72,08
1-love-quotes.com 30366 -42772 -58,48
tvrage.com 124821 -40846 -24,66
shoplocal.com 39654 -39966 -50,20
vzw.com 31323 -38387 -55,07
free-games.net 40883 -37542 -47,87
hotelplanner.com 8933 -33676 -79,03
consumeraffairs.com 50384 -32243 -39,02
lottostrategies.co 1192 -31367 -96,34
edogo.com 2015 -29850 -93,68
2011blackfridayads.com 9514 -29339 -75,51
creditcards.com 47759 -29281 -38,01
download-free-games.com 33558 -28644 -46,05
htc.com 49104 -28268 -36,54
black-friday.net 49484 -28153 -36,26
freephonetracer.com 29783 -28085 -48,53
ghacks.net 38952 -27989 -41,81
customerservicenumbers.com 48318 -27985 -36,68
langenberg.com 22037 -27534 -55,54
karaoke-lyrics.net 1595 -27269 -94,47
dressupgirl.net 42109 -26965 -39,04
robtex.com 92320 -26162 -22,08
lotteryusa.com 76685 -23355 -23,35
bestsampleresume.com 17787 -22175 -55,49
resellerratings.com 48542 -21948 -31,14
dmv.com 15619 -21672 -58,12
songs-lyrics.net 4284 -21096 -83,12
unemployment-extension.org 214 -21025 -98,99
dictionary.com 27654 -20584 -42,67
thedomainfo.com 74737 -20497 -21,52
creditcardforum.com 13481 -20119 -59,88
thesmokinggun.com 41682 -19956 -32,38
ipaddresslocation.org 6050 -19357 -76,19
free-online-games-to-play.net 1489 -19288 -92,83
digg.com 68914 -19126 -21,72
mainkeys.com 44423 -19082 -30,05
lovepoemsandquotes.com 25694 -18719 -42,15
tjoob.com 5585 -18522 -76,83
promgirl.net 15993 -18204 -53,23
americanrhetoric.com 6652 -18079 -73,10
costumekingdom.com 8813 -17670 -66,72
doc-txt.com 13794 -17229 -55,54
education.com 54829 -17127 -23,80
freegames.net 827 -17023 -95,37
halloweencostumes.com 22190 -16951 -43,31
statscrop.com 14936 -16759 -52,88
latest-hairstyles.com 40126 -16733 -29,43
abovethelaw.com 19251 -16450 -46,08
celebjihad.com 23960 -16152 -40,27
aoltv.com 62290 -15872 -20,31
cardratings.com 11762 -15859 -57,42
watch-movies-tv.info 23640 -15717 -39,93
collegeview.com 15151 -15526 -50,61
interest.com 5606 -15389 -73,30
freecookinggames.net 3207 -15246 -82,62
scrabble-word-finder.com 2564 -14442 -84,92
americanheart.org 3732 -14035 -78,99
lotsofjokes.com 12157 -13954 -53,44
ticketcity.com 48204 -13954 -22,45

A lot of these losers are database-driven websites – they mainly aggregate information and use large database systems to create as many pages as possible. Sites such as songlyrics.com, great-quotes.com, cubestat.com or lotsofjokes.com fall into this pattern. It makes sense that these sites will lose visibility.

Press portals and feed aggregators such as pressabout.us, newsalloy.com and bloglines.com were also affected, which makes sense from a Google point of view since these are the website types that are very often created by very aggressive (possibly overly aggressive) SEOs and often contain similar content.

A couple of heavily template-based websites were also affected – ticketnetwork.com/ticketcity.com, hotelscombined.com and customerservicenumbers.com fit Google’s anti-SEO bill perfectly when it comes automatically (possibly also spun) content.

Furthermore, a lot of sites that copy or rehash other peoples’ content (or are used by their users to do that) were demoted – examples include mayor sites such as digg.com, folkd.com and pastebin.com.

First Preview of SEO visibility winners

Domain Win of SEO Visibility in %
spotify.com > 30%
yellowbook.com > 30%
observer.com > 30%
nme.com > 30%
menshealth.com > 30%
poynter.org > 30%
mysanantonio.com > 30%
slideshare.net > 30%
azstarnet.com > 20%
lasvegassun.com > 20%
stackoverflow.com > 20%
epinions.com > 20%
ebates.com > 20%
locatetv.com > 20%
ovguide.com > 20%
gq.com > 20%
newyorker.com > 20%
giantbomb.com > 20%
networkworld.com > 20%
morningstar.com > 20%
livescience.com > 20%
snopes.com > 20%
marvel.com > 20%
lyrics007.com > 20%
esnips.com > 20%
techspot.com > 20%
usnews.com > 20%
drupal.org > 20%
theverge.com > 20%
miamiherald.com > 20%
webs.com > 20%
thehollywoodgossip.com > 20%

 

On the winners side it’s not as easy as on the losers side to find a pattern. But a lot of brand sites won visibility, which makes sense to Google strategy. Sites like menshealth.com, gq.com or lots of other magazines fill perfectly the gap that the losers leave.

The day started exciting and it will end exciting and tomorrow will start again exciting because I have so much data to analyze. 🙂 I keep you updated.

Marcus Tober

Marcus Tober

My name is Marcus Tober and I’m the founder of Searchmetrics. Because we really love to analyze all kinds of online data, we can give you more insights than any other company in SEO, SEM and Social Media. It’s not a job, it’s passion.

115 thoughts on “Update: Google “Bad” SEO Update – Now named Penguin Update


  • FTFA:

    “In the next few days, we’re launching an important algorithm change targeted at webspam.”

    Officially, not rolled out yet, thus not rolled out on a Wednesday.

  • Marcus, this is very interesting indeed! I am amazed at the level of study you have conducted but I can see it will be beneficial to those who aren’t spamming the internet. At the end of the day those of us searching for high quality content material that is informative and beneficial to growing our businesses need access to that without the headaches of seo aggressive companies!

  • @Jack
    Right. That’s why I assume that more changes or more important changes will follow.

  • That’s a logical flaw: if they are /launching/ in the next few days, then

    1) it’s not live
    2) there’s no major update yet

    and thus the point of the data is useless as you are measuring something else not related to the webspam / bad seo update.

  • @Zoe Alexander you’re a dreamer. I don’t know for the US but here in France plenty of websites have been hit and they “aren’t spamming the internet” … And as funny as it can be, a bunch of sites using BH techniques have raised. So once a again the Tomahawk’s “Panda” update didn’t real hit it’s target. Lots of collateral damage and the real “terrorist” are still alive … (by the way I got nothing against BH or WH, I’m both of them and my sites are fine)

  • In Denmark we’re seen several EMDs get hit but far from all. So I can only guess if it has anything to do with the fact that they were EMDs or if there is some other reason.

  • Great article Marcus. This algorithm update is almost more exciting than panda. It creates an absolute level playing field for budding internet entrepreneurs and will get more people focusing their time on creating quality content as opposed to creating rubbish spun articles

  • We analyze the Serps since 5 years now. It’s unsual to have on Wednesday, but today was an update. Thats for sure and we saw on some sites where we also have analytics access the impact. Because of updates which are normally on Monday or Thursdays it can happen that tomorrow comes an iteration of that update. So your digital point of view could be wrong. 😉 We’ll see. And in the end we update lots of our keywords now daily, I keep everyone updated.

  • Sad to see some of the latest winners from this update.

    Try searching for “make money online” and look at the #1 site – no content. Wtf?

    Obviously, there are other factors at-play here, but you’d think this late in the game that something like this would be devalued easily.

    Will be interesting to see how this shakes out over the next week or so as more site owners see their traffic drop.

  • how do you explain the bad or inappropriate websites that have made it to the top of the rankings. including a blank page ranking for “make money online” (google has since manually removed it).

  • Brian Greenberg 2012/04/26 at 12:06 am

    I hope this is not the final update… because it seems a large number of quality sites have been penalized, and replaced with low quality sites.

  • Biggest loser here is Google, as they step up their campaign to eliminate companies who do not make them money.

    The search results have gone down the tube and Google advertizing has hit all time highs, that is if you can afford their advertising algorithms and dictatorship over search and mostly spam advertizing in “Broad Links” and the Bloggers is a waste, international thieves and Google steel your money with little results.

    As the Dictator Google owns 65% of Search +/- it time to stop Google before they own even more, yes use bing, yahoo, I use duckduckgo.com they do not track you, they do not bubble you.

  • @David
    Making money should be a priority to Google, but I don’t think they will trade giving you the best results instead of showing you the sites with the best ads, because people simply stop returning.
    They want results and fast. Google is well aware of this fact, and the main exhibit is the new snippets, somewhat smart, that will have to compute, in the future, with Apple Siri alikes.

    My bet is that is becoming way harder to fight web spam, therefore they rather take down most of the sites with bad content and maybe a few quality content, in order to preserve the community.
    Imagine a zombie apocalipse, wouldn’t you rather isolate the city that started and save the rest of the world, and then latter try to rescue the non zombies or would you let it be and may darwin rule over us all?

  • Thanks for sharing good update

  • I hope that this update isn’t over yet. A lot of good quality sites been dropped and MFA sites has raised. Also that “sensation” with [make money online] already is deindexet.

  • Any idea why on earth Techdirt.com? I read that, it’s a good, genuine blog.

  • Toptenreviews.com didn’t make this list?

    It appears keyword rich ROOT and SUBDOMAINS got a huge boost, and I’ve noticed their sub-domains are dominating just about everything now.

    I’m not suggesting they should or shouldn’t, just making an observation, and curious how they did compared to everyone else?

  • Techdirt got punished by this update. By definition it must be spamming, right?

  • I run about 15 sites and all have been hit except 1 which due to the size of it (10k pages) was the only one with duplicate content so in theory was the most likely to be a loser but it increased traffic. The rest had no duplicate content or other black hat stuff but fell and some got decimated on google.

    Interesting points;

    1. all sites except the winner had several hundred direct traffic referels with 1 page view in the early hours last night
    2. a site reviewed by a google + user made ridiculous gains, try searching for short hairstyles and look at ihairstyles2012.com. Mediocre site but at number1 or high up for a bigish keyword just cos it was reviewed (the only site she reviewed) by ms collins
    3. SERPS seem to have settled down a bit my end but no change to analytics data as yet.

    Cheers

  • Many thanks for this great article.

    I would be interested in getting more details about this sentence “A couple of heavily template-based websites were also affected – “. As you explained it, I understood approximativally the samle as for DB-driven websites, also website using templates for displaying “table form” informations. Is it the right meaning?

  • Hi,

    Thanks for the insightful report.. Wonder what level playing field does Google claim of when there are number of poor websites floating on the web on top rankings & at the other end you have pretty good sites facing Google wrath with this latest update…
    Google monopolistic approach is not helping neither site owners nor users.

  • aha Google using a shotgun when a scalpel is required 😀 No good moaning about it though, until everyone finds a search alternative, it’s their game.

    Good study! Impressed at the numbers you research.

  • Many seo guys wants to know that this updation goes against seo. And Google wants to kill
    seo.

  • Remote Keyless Jimmy 2012/04/26 at 2:33 pm

    I run about 20 different sites and two seem to have been hit hard. Both are keyword rich domain name with heavy affiliate links. I think @Wes is wrong when he says “keyword rich ROOT and SUBDOMAINS got a huge boost.” Others at the webmasterworld.com thread have also noted keyworded domains and affiliate sites getting whacked.


Write a Comment

Note: If you enter something other than a name here (such as a keyword), or if your entry seems to have been made for commercial or advertising purposes, we reserve the right to delete or edit your comment. So please only post genuine comments here!

Also, please note that, with the submission of your comment, you allow your data to be stored by blog.searchmetrics.com/us/. To enable comments to be reviewed and to prevent abuse, this website stores the name, email address, comment text, and the IP address and timestamp of your comment. The comments can be deleted at any time. Detailed information can be found in our privacy statement.