searchmetrics email facebook github gplus instagram linkedin phone rss twitter whatsapp youtube arrow-right chevron-up chevron-down chevron-left chevron-right clock close menu search
61666166

Panda Update 4.1: Winners / Losers – Google U.S.

Google Panda Update 4.1The new Panda Update is here. About 4 months after the release of Panda 4.0, Google has announced a new iteration of the algorithm update via the Google+-Profile of an employee on Thursday.

The rather “slow” rollout already started early this week and is supposed to last till the beginning of next. Depending on the region, the update affects about 3%-5% of search queries.

The data is already live in our Software. Check out Searchmetrics Suite – Winners / Losers to get the current data in detail.

“New” Signals to Detect Low-Quality Content

Panda Updates focus on content quality. They are supposed to remove redundant, irrelevant content and spam from Google’s index. So far, this is nothing new. The interesting thing about the current Panda generation is the fact that apparently smaller and medium high-quality websites are supposed to benefit from the update.

Panda 4.1 g+ postGoogle said, based on feedback from both users and webmasters they have “been able to discover a few more signals to help Panda identify low-quality content more precisely”.

Following the bigger Panda 4.0 update, the new Panda seems to be a rather “small“ iteration. That’s why Search Engine Land is calling the 27th update from the Panda family “Panda 4.1“.

Panda 4.1 Winners and Losers

Just a friendly reminder: The following data is based on the organic SEO Visibility for each domain for all researched keywords, compared to our last data point. The actual traffic by each domain – for example brand and/or direct traffic etc. – can vary with values given here. Also a win or loss doesn’t necessarily mean a causation with Panda. Sometimes it is based on simple technical issues or redirects like nokia.com.

Let’s take a look at the data.

Google.com – Panda 4.1 Losers in the U.S.

Here is a filtered overview of the losers (SEO Visibility) ordered by percentage:

    Domain – Loser     Before     After   Change in %
yellow.com  16383 3413 -79%
similarsites.com  118771 25197 -79%
free-coloring-pages.com  12268 2960 -76%
dwyer-inst.com  13225 3229 -76%
issitedownrightnow.com  69354 18376 -74%
updatestar.com  13232 3788 -71%
office365.com  29365 8781 -70%
findthebest.com  30848 93937 -70%
homewyse.com  14161 4410 -69%
adelaide.edu.au  20351 6537 -68%
pearltrees.com  16769 5503 -67%
ok.co.uk  18226 5995 -67%
socialcomments.org  27476 9058 -67%
mybillcom.com  12258 4136 -66%
tgiblackfriday.com  10037 3420 -66%
discountsstory.net  20907 7337 -65%
indyweek.com  13373 4826 -64%
zabasearch.com  42679 15697 -63%
exacttarget.com  14849 5729 -61%
okc.gov  12547 4907 -61%
no1reviews.com  18403 7235 -61%
mademan.com  23006 9779 -57%
studymode.com  10756 4611 -57%
thefair.com  14067 6277 -55%
appappeal.com  11265 5149 -54%
chronicle.com  17244 8208 -52%
lyricstranslations.com  16944 8077 -52%
onhealth.com  118017 56735 -52%
cherrybam.com  20178 9736 -52%
nerve.com  17264 9016 -48%
emedtv.com  30739 16266 -47%
hubpages.com  30493 163548 -46%
brothersoft.com  25357 13969 -45%
collider.com  47733 26383 -45%
337.com  21172 12141 -43%
hypestat.com  18047 10553 -42%
telecomfile.com  17652 10448 -41%
discountednewspapers.com  19472 11624 -40%
bugmenot.com  25339 15152 -40%
medterms.com  286956 172836 -40%
translationcloud.com  43295 2674 -38%
archive.today  48603 30085 -38%
game-oldies.com  47279 2932 -38%
kxan.com  26622 16609 -38%
thinkbabynames.com  22762 14246 -37%
amtrakcalifornia.com  18965 1192 -37%
theepochtimes.com  34385 21638 -37%
addresses.com  33042 21012 -36%
hrblock.com  24599 15775 -36%
areacode.org  33412 21799 -35%
buzzle.com  76279 50134 -34%
militarycac.com  30014 1977 -34%
howstuffworks.com  1251213 827093 -34%
eprize.com  42565 28358 -33%
travelandleisure.com  110818 74347 -33%
webutations.info  190251 127762 -33%
appbrain.com  59235 40254 -32%
enjoygram.com  28335 19322 -32%
dailypuppy.com  24775 1701 -31%
oxforddictionaries.com  383172 265208 -31%
offers.com  56036 39082 -30%
guardianlv.com  34268 24045 -30%
thinkexist.com  138435 97364 -30%
hallmark.com  61087 4381 -28%
ehow.com  101928 73157 -28%
laws.com  26208 18839 -28%
greenwichmeantime.com  45629 32906 -28%
miamiherald.com  99912 72274 -28%
dubbed-scene.com  26502 1926 -27%
bobdylan.com  27307 19881 -27%
cardhub.com  49508 36101 -27%
mommysavesbig.com  46118 33913 -26%
healthcentral.com  47799 35173 -26%
appcrawlr.com  29088 21595 -26%

 

Google.com – Panda 4.1 Winners in the U.S.

Here is a filtered overview of the winners (SEO Visibility) ordered by percentage:

 

    Domain – Winner     Before     After   Change in %
comdotgame.com  2632 38231 1353%
hongkiat.com  135 68372 406%
babble.com  8963 42916 379%
rd.com  17209 71434 315%
mediamass.net  6839 27876 308%
hotelguides.com  8563 32957 285%
yourtango.com  30624 109148 256%
moreofit.com  6431 22864 256%
celebrity-gossip.net  10727 38068 255%
spoonful.com  2813 89573 218%
ivillage.com  11818 37065 214%
800-numbers.net  11809 34631 193%
thepiratebay.se  2571 67457 162%
aceshowbiz.com  21679 55059 154%
dummies.com  42806 104764 145%
geekwire.com  11606 28319 144%
ispot.tv  12242 28062 129%
womansday.com  11868 27195 129%
bncollege.com  36738 76969 110%
afterdawn.com  18519 38775 109%
allwomenstalk.com  19836 41088 107%
livescience.com  79499 164323 107%
savings.com  25874 52886 104%
fastcodesign.com  25303 50326 99%
mystore411.com  24262 47482 96%
health.com  120733 212827 76%
unblocksit.es  23559 40897 74%
newseum.org  36201 59205 64%
netdoctor.co.uk  25973 41246 59%
celebdirtylaundry.com  34511 53817 56%
digitaltrends.com  137257 21076 54%
quickanddirtytips.com  28288 43284 53%
tvtropes.org  105715 160152 51%
simplyrecipes.com  100684 149017 48%
glamour.com  53907 77933 45%
astrologyzone.com  45185 65237 44%
chow.com  117933 168931 43%
arstechnica.com  121742 171708 41%
parenting.com  49936 70185 41%
realsimple.com  180553 252922 40%
webopedia.com  153512 213758 39%
healthgrades.com  70386 97103 38%
laptopmag.com  53221 73249 38%
dispatch.com  44614 60412 35%
dealcatcher.com  95757 128887 35%
businessdictionary.com  104606 140213 34%
vice.com  157693 208496 32%
smithsonianmag.com  18069 238733 32%
thefreedictionary.com  2124356 2774647 31%
internetslang.com  50578 65093 29%

 

Conclusion: News, Content Sites and Download Portals win – Games, Lyrics and some Medical Portals lose

The 4.1 iteration of Panda ties in with the preceding updates. Losers are often games or lyrics portals as well as websites dealing with medical issues and content – to cut it short (here I am repeating myself): in general, it hit pages with thin content. Aggregators do not provide unique and relevant content.

It doesn’t seem to be very relevant for Google to list (that is: aggregate information about) sites that are down at the moment. That was measurable already with Panda 4.0 and it is true for the current update as well:

downrightnow is down

On the other hand, sites with quality content won. Babble.com has been a loser of the Panda 4.0 update and has now recovered quite impressively. And there are even more losers of Panda 4.0 that recovered. Just to name a few: rd.com, Hotelguides.com, Yourtango.com, Spoonful.com or ivillage.com. Also, some quality sites with relevant topic content like Simplyrecipes.com or brands like Glamour.com have benefited from the update.

 

Marcus Tober

Marcus Tober

My name is Marcus Tober and I’m the founder of Searchmetrics. Because we really love to analyze all kinds of online data, we can give you more insights than any other company in SEO, SEM and Social Media. It’s not a job, it’s passion.

93 thoughts on “Panda Update 4.1: Winners / Losers – Google U.S.


  • The Find The Best loser entry should have a 0 on the end.

  • I love how the no 1 winner is a super thin site with no content whatsoever, and games that are copied from other thousands of sites, and keyboard stuffing on the footer.
    Now THAT is quality google! Nice update…

  • Why a site like Pirate Bay which provides online downloads of movies and mp3 benefited from the Panda 4.1 update? And content site like Hubpages didn’t benefited?

  • …thanks vor the data and the conclusion, Marcus!

  • Panda 4.1 update looks good so far

  • Daniel Daines-Hutt 2014/09/29 at 10:46 am

    Interesting read with data and a great visual write up so good work!
    Just added you now on g+

    Dan

  • I love your post thanks for great info.. panda 4.1 is usefull for us to find content errors in the sites..

  • In contrary to your conclusion, I see more medical sites as winners than losers. Health winners include netdoctor.co.uk , Health.com and Healthgrades.

  • Noticed changes on september 23,some of the sites got 200% traffic and some other lost their rankings.

  • Sarha writes “Why a site like Pirate Bay which provides online downloads of movies and mp3 benefited from the Panda 4.1 update? And content site like Hubpages didn’t benefited?”

    Well Sarha, *pleasebekind, Aaron (edited)*. Perhaps if they kicked out the non-native English speakers who can’t write, the site would not be so hated by Google.

    *pleasebekind, Aaron (edited)*

  • This update had no effect for our site, but we may have been too late. We discovered that Feedfury had duplicated 440 of our blog articles, sending us into the supplemental index. Feedfury removed the feed for us, but probably too late for this update.
    We’re also still waiting on Penguin, and I’m not sure if a Penguin penalty means that we won’t see Panda improvements until Penguin refreshes.

  • Seems that a high percentage of the sites that are winners are commercial sites. Strange that more and more after these updates, sites that have thin informational content but lots of goods to sell are ranking higher and higher. Ridiculous.

  • Poor or thin content ? Phhh please

    What do you think of this then? Similar sites like these with scraped contents are always ranking
    http://www.freepik.com/

  • Good Content was always the mantra. But, how does a download site not count as thin content site?

  • Brilliant write-up, Marcus!

    I find it fascinating seeing both the winners and losers of each update released by Google. Although I do feel for the losers, I think these updates are great and hopefully it brings the losers to up their efforts with their content.

  • This is really random. It seems like informational websites got nailed, hard, while trashy websites got a lot of help. Medical portals got hit hard too, probably for having short articles. But really, who wants to read a wall of text just to figure out if they have a cold or not and how to treat it? One side of Google’s neck says: “Write succinct, informative content that is tailored for your users.” The other side says: “Less than a certain number of words that we set as arbitrary is ‘thin’, so write a ton of fluff, even if it pisses off your users.’

    Once again, great update Google. Get it together.

  • Egga Référencement 2014/09/29 at 9:35 pm

    Funny how some sites that were impacted by Panda have come back with this update (I’d think Piratebay was hit a couple of updates ago). Moreofit goes up while similarsites goes down, go figure. We’ll have to see how Google refines this update in the coming months.

  • Alex Chaidaroglou 2014/09/29 at 9:51 pm

    Very informative and timely insights as always. Thank you Marcus!

  • piratebay.se is not thin content? The page is filled with ads and it only provides torrent links.

    Astrologyzone? Have you checked that site?

    http://www.800-numbers.net

    The real explanation about panda update is that everybody’s ranking is defined by pure luck. Only SEOs can see the reason behind these silly moves in ranking but any explanation is insult to intelligence of average human being. Thin content don’t has anything to do with ranking as evident from links above.

  • Interesting to see, but it doesn’t look like my site got hit at all this time. I got a whack with Panda 4.0, but I have been working on fixing it up. I don’t think I have recovered yet as I have added about 100 posts since the end of May, and I have slowly crawled my traffic back to what it was post Panda 4.0.
    My traffic has remained fairly consistent, rising and dipping within a few hundred visits every day over the past week. It will be interesting to see what happens over the next few weeks.

  • These lists doesn’t make much sense to me, as more than one already said in comments, there are sites between the “winners” which aren’t quality sites at all. I guess Panda 4.1 is targeting something more than “thin content” sites, maybe something related with site structure or external elements that give hints about the site authority in its niche.

  • Any idea why Google choses to penalise the whole site, rather than just target pages or folders that contain the thin content? Sometimes by nature a certain type of page can be thin (product page for example), whereas other pages will be ok (product listing pages).

  • Some of the calculations in the winners list (% change) are a bit off. Just look through the top-10 and you’ll notice a few which don’t add up, their % change should be far higher than the table states.

  • To me it looks like this update failed for the most part (regarding Google’s intentions). Many sites that benefit its readers dropped while other sites that are spam, at best, benefited. Pirate Bay as mentioned above is a top ‘illegal’ torrent site.

    Grats to geekwire though!

    Anyone have any insight on http://craftgawker.com/ ? I’m quite curious if they have ever been hit for being as large as they are and no ‘real’ content. They do block a lot in their robots.txt, but what are your thoughts?

  • DLC, I think these updates are always good. Google updates their algorithm in order to make the results better for its users. Thus Google is widely accepted by many of the users worldwide.

  • Why a site like piratebay you say. Probably because it provides quality pirated downloads of movies & mp3’s. ROFL

  • I can discern anything from this ‘update’. Watch as Google’s adwords or revenue increases. It must be related to their ad spend in any vertical. Thin content makes no sense either, why should a site have thick content to be better? It’s a know fact humans only scan and don’t read on the web.

    What are the other metrics duplicate content? Maybe but then finding the original for any given piece must be near impossible.


Write a Comment

Note: If you enter something other than a name here (such as a keyword), or if your entry seems to have been made for commercial or advertising purposes, we reserve the right to delete or edit your comment. So please only post genuine comments here!

Also, please note that, with the submission of your comment, you allow your data to be stored by blog.searchmetrics.com/us/. To enable comments to be reviewed and to prevent abuse, this website stores the name, email address, comment text, and the IP address and timestamp of your comment. The comments can be deleted at any time. Detailed information can be found in our privacy statement.