Yesterday Amit Singhal (http://insidesearch.blogspot.com/2011/11/giving-you-fresher-more-recent-search.html) from Google confirmed a new bigger Google Index update. The impact on all the searches is approximately 35%, which is as measured by the number of searches every day really a lot. As opposed to the Panda update it has an impact of nearly the double amount of searches!

You can imagine how my heart beat was after I heard this news. Before there was no “name” for the update I thought about a cool name like “black widow update” or something similar because I assumed a hugh impact in the Serps.
In the description from Amit and in some articles like on Techcrunch http://techcrunch.com/2011/11/03/googles-new-algorithm-update-impacts-35-of-searches/ you’ll find more details. Google wants to supply the information need as the user want to have fresh content on a specific query or not. If you’re looking for event related content then you expect freshness and no content from old events e.g. if you’re looking for “olympics”. Then you get results for London 2012. On strong news related searches Google invented the QDF feature lots of years ago which also shows fresh articles especially newspaper content. But to analyze to type of the query and giving the user more fresh content is the right way to improve the quality of the Serps.
There is an impact on 1/3rd of all queries
If you think about the 35% again, then it means that one third of every query is related to fresh content. For webmasters with less new/fresh content it could be difficult to rank high because if the most of the queries you ranked in the past where outranked by fresh content (where linkpop should be nonrelevant) you have to think about creating new content. The optimization of tag pages or static pages will be affected by this new update.
To get a better overview about the impact of the update in the google.com index I analyzed our current results we computed right after the update. Our metric for that is the SEO Visibility. It is a metrics based on the search volume of a keyword, the type (informational, navigational or transactional search) and the rank of a URL. The database is the biggest SEO database in the world and you can also check the results by yourself in our Searchmetrics Essentials software. There is also a free demo account after a 3min registration.
Many winners, a few losers
Usually I post after those big updates at first the losers and then the winners. The reason is that there is mostly a correlation identifiable, like after the several Panda updates. This time I post the winners first. Because after this update I found NO type of losers but a lot winners which have lots of similarities. And this is also the correlation for this update. Google prefers sites like news sites, broadcast sites, video portals and a lot Brand sites. This is also a type of sites which have regularly fresh content and a big brand with higher CTRs.
In the list of winners you see many news, broadcasting and brand sites:
| Domain | SEO Visibility 11/06/2011 | SEO Visibility 10/30/2011 | Percent | |
| Brand | last.fm | 1.386.908 | 1.232.115 | 12,56 |
| Brand | overstock.com | 814.747 | 774.752 | 5,16 |
| Brand | lonelyplanet.com | 412.446 | 377.565 | 9,24 |
| Brand | rockhall.com | 62.610 | 36.387 | 72,07 |
| Brand | marthastewart.com | 170.392 | 147.258 | 15,71 |
| Brand | wikiquote.org | 315.054 | 292.471 | 7,72 |
| Brand | dominos.com | 86.572 | 65.370 | 32,43 |
| Brand | papajohns.com | 101.561 | 81.411 | 24,75 |
| Brand | squidoo.com | 406.930 | 386.806 | 5,20 |
| Brand | soundcloud.com | 229.032 | 211.331 | 8,38 |
| Brand | playstation.com | 176.529 | 159.381 | 10,76 |
| Brand | comcast.com | 187.415 | 170.841 | 9,70 |
| Brand | hotels.com | 210.944 | 195.153 | 8,09 |
| Brand | vzw.com | 54.978 | 40.428 | 35,99 |
| Brand | guitarcenter.com | 103.490 | 89.295 | 15,90 |
| Brand | cox.com | 91.860 | 80.679 | 13,86 |
| Brand | buy.com | 163.761 | 152.926 | 7,09 |
| Brand | citibank.com | 120.652 | 109.880 | 9,80 |
| Brand | scottrade.com | 32.891 | 22.257 | 47,78 |
| Brand | aim.com | 77.448 | 67.757 | 14,30 |
| Brand | southwestvacations.com | 27.985 | 18.632 | 50,20 |
| Brand | boostmobile.com | 39.996 | 31.092 | 28,64 |
| Brand | hawaiianair.com | 35.970 | 27.076 | 32,85 |
| Brand | nationalcar.com | 26.454 | 17.583 | 50,45 |
| Brand | skype.com | 97.380 | 89.053 | 9,35 |
| Brand | garmin.com | 71.229 | 62.918 | 13,21 |
| Brand | sonypictures.com | 154.248 | 146.029 | 5,63 |
| Brand | opera.com | 50.612 | 42.483 | 19,13 |
| Brand | napster.com | 31.720 | 23.632 | 34,22 |
| Celebrity news | perezhilton.com | 643.042 | 552.660 | 16,35 |
| Celebrity news | thehollywoodgossip.com | 166.931 | 138.466 | 20,56 |
| Celebrity news | hollywoodreporter.com | 219.287 | 201.657 | 8,74 |
| Celebrity news | hellomagazine.com | 34.035 | 22.250 | 52,97 |
| Celebrity news | actressarchives.com | 57.257 | 48.790 | 17,35 |
| Government | ny.gov | 144.173 | 102.536 | 40,61 |
| Government | bls.gov | 251.541 | 223.890 | 12,35 |
| News | huffingtonpost.com | 1.895.562 | 1.782.006 | 6,37 |
| News | dailymail.co.uk | 617.552 | 587.989 | 5,03 |
| News | allthingsd.com | 63.558 | 42.620 | 49,13 |
| News | businessinsider.com | 225.582 | 207.656 | 8,63 |
| News | nj.com | 210.528 | 197.621 | 6,53 |
| News | rr.com | 141.118 | 128.880 | 9,50 |
| News | medicalnewstoday.com | 136.022 | 125.037 | 8,79 |
| News | christianpost.com | 49.681 | 38.864 | 27,83 |
| News | salon.com | 107.948 | 97.666 | 10,53 |
| Tech news | engadget.com | 515.212 | 472.053 | 9,14 |
| Tech news | techcrunch.com | 294.944 | 268.400 | 9,89 |
| TV | tvguide.com | 697.920 | 663.713 | 5,15 |
| TV | aoltv.com | 275.456 | 245.542 | 12,18 |
| TV | zap2it.com | 301.686 | 282.817 | 6,67 |
| TV | buddytv.com | 224.144 | 205.470 | 9,09 |
| University | pitt.edu | 96.172 | 81.635 | 17,81 |
| Video | youtube.com | 6.942.619 | 5.464.798 | 27,04 |
| Video | myspace.com | 2.982.113 | 2.587.181 | 15,26 |
| Video | metacafe.com | 367.335 | 338.992 | 8,36 |
| Video | break.com | 211.243 | 189.391 | 11,54 |
| Video | funnyordie.com | 189.309 | 169.583 | 11,63 |
| Other | familydoctor.org | 150.551 | 122.338 | 23,06 |
| Other | rhapsody.com | 128.108 | 107.650 | 19,00 |
| Other | examiner.com | 97.413 | 80.017 | 21,74 |
| Other | theblackfriday.com | 83.978 | 66.991 | 25,36 |
| Other | allthelyrics.com | 48.348 | 32.342 | 49,49 |
| Other | ratemyprofessors.com | 120.409 | 106.064 | 13,52 |
| Other | cheapoair.com | 104.694 | 93.718 | 11,71 |
| Other | applebees.com | 49.469 | 39.221 | 26,13 |
| Other | heavy.com | 38.192 | 28.776 | 32,72 |
| Other | stars21.com | 33.680 | 24.624 | 36,78 |
| Other | java-gaming.com | 27.975 | 19.152 | 46,07 |
| Other | scribd.com | 55.354 | 46.804 | 18,27 |
And here the list of loser. There is no one special group of losers like after all the Panda update.
| Domain | SEO Visibility 11/06/2011 | SEO Visibility 10/30/2011 | Percent |
| comcast.net | 283.036 | 367.672 | -23,02 |
| state.ny.us | 151.322 | 204.599 | -26,04 |
| univision.com | 65.720 | 117.392 | -44,02 |
| usmagazine.com | 210.329 | 254.976 | -17,51 |
| newseum.org | 58.367 | 95.132 | -38,65 |
| the570.com | 23.214 | 50.775 | -54,28 |
| americanexpress.com | 109.808 | 132.096 | -16,87 |
| lyricspick.com | 29.360 | 49.287 | -40,43 |
| capitalone.com | 95.609 | 112.678 | -15,15 |
| peoplestylewatch.com | 48.143 | 63.439 | -24,11 |
| realtor.org | 30.849 | 44.230 | -30,25 |
| jezebel.com | 63.698 | 76.736 | -16,99 |
| plentyoffish.com | 30.987 | 43.898 | -29,41 |
| radioshack.com | 41.279 | 54.039 | -23,61 |
| gizmag.com | 41.630 | 54.231 | -23,24 |
| anandtech.com | 37.963 | 50.435 | -24,73 |
| independent.co.uk | 55.691 | 67.858 | -17,93 |
| cpsc.gov | 62.175 | 73.974 | -15,95 |
| nj.gov | 66.367 | 78.117 | -15,042 |
| stylelist.com | 15.038 | 26.766 | -43,817 |
| justinbieberzone.com | 23.903 | 35.292 | -32,271 |
| shoplocal.com | 42.522 | 53.484 | -20,496 |
| hamstersoft.com | 17.740 | 28.616 | -38,007 |
| bncollege.com | 42.925 | 53.543 | -19,831 |
| mbnanetaccess.com | 52.320 | 62.795 | -16,681 |
| blogger.com | 40.172 | 50.426 | -20,335 |
| netscape.com | 42.035 | 52.276 | -19,59 |
So in the end, the update affected really a lot keywords. But it’s different to Panda and the right step for Google to satisfy the need of the user for the best search results.
Tags: freshness update | Google | update


Comments (10)
Comments (60)
Interesting news, I think it is a good update, but we will se
Many regards from Denmark
it would be interesting to see this data matched to the panda data and see if any panda hit sites saw a benefit here (squidoo jumps out a bit).
Marcus,
I tend to analyze search as a zero sum game which is why I was surprised that you can’t seem to find a proportional amount of losers to explain the gains by winners. Do you think that smaller, less frequently updated sites are going to bear the brunt of losses from the new update?
Will
Hi Will,
there are losers, but no losers like after Panda. Looks like that Google pushed some news and brand sites and some sites with more static content lost. This is a really interesting update because this is what the users wants. I keep you updated if there are more updates and more losers.
Cheers
Marcus
Good Day Marcus – I am delighted to find such a thought-provoking post and to learn about Searchmetrics. However, I take issue with the focus on keywords with regard to Google’s most recent update. From the beginning, I have seen Google’s Panda update as a shift from keyword focus to one of user experience that relies more on content combined with behavioral factors. I believe that you cannot optimize for keywords any longer. So, sites that have fallen in position for certain queries were likely not that relevant to the query in the first place. Interesting in my client engagements is that the keywords they “optimized for” are rarely the ones that are bringing a significant number of visitors from search engine referrals.
Google is finalizing the “new world order” of relevance and our methods must change also.
Hi Marcus
It would be interesting to see how things have evolved since you wrote this article. Have you made another update? Sometimes the loosers in time actually will get a net positive effect.
Many regards
Helle
Wow nice work! Thank you for sharing it with us – it must have taken you hours to gather all the information.
As the post above says – it could be interesting to see if there have been any further news now.
Regards
Bo
Hallo Marcus
Interesting, Google has to much power, but interesting artikel, good work
Many regards
excellent site, very good information. Greetings.
Very good and usefull information, thank you Marcus and have a nice day
Trackbacks (50)
Comments (60)
[...] full list is also available on the Searchmetrics blog, where you can click through on the individual URLs to see the changes in more detail. [...]
[...] full list is also available on the Searchmetrics blog, where you can click through on the individual URLs to see the changes in more detail. [...]
[...] full list is also available on the Searchmetrics blog, where you can click through on the individual URLs to see the changes in more detail. [...]
[...] And now, some four days after the announcement, we’re beginning to see some winners and losers. Searchmetrics used its in-house SEO database to determine the early findings. “Our metric for that is the SEO [...]
[...] full list is also available on the Searchmetrics blog, where you can click through on the individual URLs to see the changes in more detail. [...]
[...] full list is also available on the Searchmetrics blog, where you can click through on the individual URLs to see the changes in more detail. [...]
[...] full list is also available on the Searchmetrics blog, where you can click through on the individual URLs to see the changes in more detail. [...]
[...] Searchmetrics divulgou uma lista com os sites que foram beneficiados com a atualização, e outra com os sites analisados [...]
[...] According to SearchMetrics, Realtor.org was negatively impacted by the recent change. The SEO visibility ranking shows that Realtor.org was down 32.5% since the Google update. No [...]
[...] findings come from SearchMetrics, the same company that has fairly accurately estimated Panda-related winners and losers several [...]
[...] full list is also available on the Searchmetrics blog, where you can click through on the individual URLs to see the changes in more detail. [...]
[...] This big search algorithm change happened just last week. Since then, according to Google, 35% of all searches. That’s a lot! 1 in 3! Ultimately, when the algorithmic dust had cleared, the outcome proved to have three clear winners: news, broadcasting, and brand sites. [...]
[...] visibility resulting from various iterations of Google’s Panda update, has released a list of top winners and losers from this “freshness” update. Interestingly, both lists include plenty of big [...]
[...] In pratica Singhal ci dice che il 65% dei contenuti non verrà influenzato dal Freshness Update. Ma chi lavora nell’ambito del restante 35%, qualche sudore freddo lo ha di sicuro. [...]
[...] SearchMetrics, which has provided data about glee winners and losers of search visibility resulting from various iterations of Google’s Panda update, has released a list of top winners and losers from this “freshness” update. [...]
[...] findings come from SearchMetrics, the same company that has fairly accurately estimated Panda-related winners and losers several [...]
[...] full list is also available on the Searchmetrics blog, where you can click through on the individual URLs to see the changes in more detail. [...]
[...] SearchMetrics, which includes supplied information concerning the those who win as well as nonwinners associated with search awareness caused by numerous iterations of Googles Panda up-date, offers introduced a summary of best winning trades and also nonwinners using this freshness replace. [...]
[...] measures SEO visibility of sites across the Web. Its results are adjusted to eliminate outliers in either relative or absolute terms. In the Caffeine update, [...]
[...] measures SEO visibility of sites across the Web. Its results are adjusted to eliminate outliers in either relative or absolute terms. In the Caffeine update, [...]
[...] Journal – November 2011 News Roundup Phil Wolff 1 November 2011 8:29 am A November 2011 “freshness update” to Google search result ranking favors Skype.com, improving its SEO visibility 9.35% from [...]
[...] Аналитики SearchMetrics, выявлявшие те сайты, которые выигрывают или проигрывают после очередного обновления от Google, в качестве критерия ранжирования использовали «индекс видимости», основанного на анализе миллиона ключевых слов. Представленные в таблице позиции сайтов, связаны с этим индексом, а не с их возросшим или упавшим трафиком. [...]
[...] measures SEO visibility of sites across the Web. Its results are adjusted to eliminate outliers in either relative or absolute terms. In the Caffeine update, [...]
[...] findings come from SearchMetrics, the same company that has fairly accurately estimated Panda-related winners and losers several [...]
[...] Unlike the Google Panda updates whose results showed a decided commonality among losing sites, the freshness algorithm’s noteworthy commonality occurs among the winners. While Google shows a clear preference for news and video sites, there are many brand sites like MarthaStewart.com and Dominos.com that have benefited from the change. What may be most interesting is the presence of Google’s own Blogger.com on the list of losers. Searchmetrics compiled a list of winners and losers using their extensive in-house SEO software; the entire list can be found here. [...]
[...] Para ver la lista completa de los sitios que fueron afectados, visita el post en Searchmetrics. [...]
[...] timely search results — which Google figured would impact about 35% of all searches – Searchmetrics has analyzed the big winners and losers (in terms of visibility) since the changeover. Winners, [...]
[...] points were needed, so up stepped SearchMetrics with their search visibility score to provide a ready to digest list of winners, and a [...]
[...] dal Freshness Update. Ma chi lavora nell’ambito del restante 35%, qualche sudore freddo lo ha di sicuro. Post correlati:Google indicizza AJAX/JavaScript… e i commenti di Facebook!Google, GoMo e il [...]
[...] points were needed, so up stepped SearchMetrics with their search visibility score to provide a ready to digest list of winners, and a [...]
[...] и бренды. Оценка изменений была сделана компанией SearchMetrics, которая в этом году уже несколько раз изучала [...]
[...] Searchmetrics blog Posted as a headline on November 9, 2011 [...]
[...] published some research yesterday showing the winners and losers of the Google Freshness update but in my opinion the issue is a bit more complicated than [...]
[...] published a Google Freshness Update Top Winners and Losers chart, and as a result I have been asked my many UK agencies this week on [...]
[...] O Searchmetrics divulgou uma lista com os sites que foram beneficiados com a atualização, e outra com os sites analisados que perderam tráfego. O que surpreendeu foi que, a lista dos sites que perderam tráfego apresentou domínios de várias categorias como blogs, sites de marcas, e contou até mesmo com o site da Google, o Blogger, que perdeu cerca de 20% do tráfego. [...]
[...] is more to the Update than just freshness, based on results of a SearchMetrics analysis. Brand names like Coke, Hotels.com and Dominos.com also gained in visibility or ranking after the [...]
[...] got out some kerosene and threw it on the update with its “winners and losers” data. The most interesting thing in that list for regular folks like us is the Blogger.com drop in [...]
[...] got out some kerosene and threw it on a refurbish with a “winners and losers” data. The many engaging thing in that list for unchanging folks like us is a Blogger.com dump in [...]
[...] свіжою інформацією. Аналітики SearchMetrics провели дослідження, в ході якого було з’ясовано, як новий алгоритм Fresh [...]
[...] timely search results — that Google figured would impact about 35% of all searches – Searchmetrics has analyzed a large winners and losers (in terms of visibility) given a changeover. Winners, [...]
[...] SearchMetrics, which has provided data about the winners and losers of search visibility resulting from various iterations of Google’s Panda update, has released a list of top winners and losers from this “freshness” update. [...]
[...] You can read more about the update through the awesome analysis over at SearchMetrics. [...]
[...] to analysis by Marcus Tober of Searchmetrics, the key “winners” resulting from Google Freshness (i.e. those with a significantly [...]
[...] to analysis by Marcus Tober of Searchmetrics, the key “winners” resulting from Google Freshness (i.e. those with a significantly [...]
[...] to analysis by Marcus Tober of Searchmetrics, the key “winners” resulting from Google Freshness (i.e. those with a significantly higher SEO [...]
[...] Check out this great post by Searchmetrics to see the winners and losers of the update. This article was written by Justin [...]
[...] A November 2011 “freshness update” to Google search result ranking favors Skype.com, improving its SEO visibility 9.35% from September. [...]
[...] can read more about the update through the awesome analysis over at SearchMetrics. Image Credit: erwlas over on [...]
[...] more on the “freshness” of content rather than on past updates. And based on an analysis from Searchmetrics, which has accurately projected the effects of past Google algorithm updates, the focus on [...]
[...] you to determine the percentage of similarity between two pages; Speedtester This tool …Google Freshness Update – Searchmetrics SEO Blog – Our metric for that is the SEO Visibility. It is a metrics based on the search volume of a [...]