Google News-Wave Update: Media Websites Surfing the Winner Tide

June 19th, 2015 | Analysis 55 comments

Within a few weeks, Google has tweaked its core algorithm and rolled out an update for the second time without officially anouncing it. According to our quick analysis, this update seems to be primarily concerned with trending keywords as well as temporary search intentions related to informational (shorthead) keywords. First-glance-winners are first and foremost media websites with one of the most important elements of the update being: topicality. That’s why I decided to use the working title “News-Wave Update”: Google surfes the trending tides! If this is supposed to be a permanent change, there will be a much higher volatility of search results in the future.

google-surfer

Volatility is the key focus here. This post is based on really fresh data, but while I was writing these lines, the rankings have already changed again. Google seems to update the SERPs constantly with new newsworthy content. It seems a bit like QDF (the concept of “hot” topics being included in the algorithm) has gone wild to me.

There is no official confirmation of the update by Google (yet), but this is not supposed to be a Panda-Update, which has been announced to be happening in “the next few weeks”.

Dr. Pete from Moz assumed a relation to HTTPS – and also to Wikipedia (currently moving to HTTPS). In fact, Wikipedia seems to be involved somehow, but differently than Dr. Pete supposed – at least that is what I believe and I’m going to show you what I mean in a minute.

What has happened until now?

On June 17th, many webmasters recognized ranking changes. First, let me collect the facts regarding the quesion, what the update was not:

  • …related to Panda or Penguin: John Mueller (Google) said in a Webmaster Tool Central-Hangout, that there has been some kind of action, but this has not been an algorithm change related to Panda or Penguin.
  • …an HTTPS-Update: As a response to Dr. Pete’s post on Moz,  Gary Illyes (Google) tweeted, he is not aware of any connection to HTTPS. Background of this assumption ahs been the fact that Wikipedia is currently switching to HTTPS.

Similiar to the most recent Google Phantom Update at the end of April / beginning of Mai 2015, Google did not make any clear statements regarding the update.

Winner of the Update

Clear winner of the update are domains related to news, magazines and newspapers, in the broadest sense: media. The current data is already available in our software – the Searchmetrics Suite. You can acces most parts of the data also without having a login:

Winner / Loser US – Searchmetrics Suite

I don’t want to include the whole list here because you can see it in the Suite, but already the top winners (sorted according to absolute gain of SEO Visibility) speak for themselves:

.

Domain SEO Visibility 19.06. Change in %
wsj.com  895796 19%
usatoday.com  1288587 11%
dailymail.co.uk  995618 12%
businessinsider.com  625008 20%
time.com  905321 13%
nbcnews.com  387537 30%
latimes.com  692956 13%
nypost.com  409336 21%
techcrunch.com  345354 26%
foxnews.com  665623 12%
steampowered.com  350761 22%
bizjournals.com  319230 24%
theverge.com  417862 17%
fortune.com  172396 45%
gizmodo.com  289973 20%
dict.cc  126850 59%
hollywoodlife.com  399168 13%
techtarget.com  252981 20%
windowsphone.com  299667 16%

.

As you can see, the list mostly consists of well-known media websites publishing fresh and newsworthy content on a regular basis. In most of the cases, the respective URLs of these domains regarding their winner keywords have hit the top rankings out of nowhere.

Here are some examples of the winners:

time.com

time-com-visibility-us

techcrunch.com techcrunch-com-visibility-us

Those domains have largely benefitted for keywords like celebrity names. To cut it short: Many of the (organic) SERPs regarding the affected keywords look like an extended News box. And as I said at the beginning, the data has already changed while i was writing.

What is special about this update (and maybe related to to the strong topicality): There is actually no need to provide you with a loser list. Most of the domains that dropped have lost rankings because of the ranking boost of the winners.

“Losers” of the Update

Yet, I can’t deny some quality related connections being among this weeks losers. Among some spammers, there are a few bigger websites which lost on keywords that seem to look like Panda-related keywords, like dillards.com or gactv.com.

Interestingly, both of the domains I mentioned already dropped a week before:

SEO Visibility dillards.com

When you take a closer look, you can see a small step in the falling curve that markes last week’s data. Thus, the drop may have another reason than the current update. Same with the other example:SEO Visibility gactv.com

This is the “Google News-Wave Update”

Most of the changes are related to informational and newsworthy keywords. Please note that also keywords usually unrelated to news can become newsworthy when something happens that involves a topic which is related to this keyword. Typically, most of the keywords seem to derive from the shorthead, consisting of one or two words. And Google tries to serve the most current search intention for these kinds of searches.

Because news domains and magazines are (next to Wikipedia) one of the most important sources and elements of search results, they have been benifitting enourmously. BUT: This seems to be only a temporary success.

QDF gone wild?

Since 2007, QDF, which means “Query Deserve Freshness”, has been being considered by Google. This is a concept incorporating issues like:

  • (significant rise of) search volume
  • (rise of) mentions of a topic in newssites and/or blogs

Now, this update seems to have taken QDF too far. It can’t be the intention of QDF to turn complete organic SERPs into something like a single news integration. Google is not supposed to be Twitter.

What about Google Trends & Twitter?

There was a huge relaunch of Google Trends simultaneously on June, 17th, when the shaking in the SERPs started. The search trends can now be analyzed by everyone in real-time. So, the relaunch of Google Trends is “the biggest expansion of Google Trends since 2012”, Google postet on their offical blog. In addition, Google is now tracking trends on YouTube and Google News. Also new in Google’s portfolio: Since February 2015, Google has complete access to the stream on Twitter.

That’s why acuality is one the key factors for the Newswave Update. Google’s algorithm can now react immediately on changes in the search volume of specific keywords or trendings topics on Twitter, YouTube or Google News.

The Role of Wikipedia and/ or HTTPS

As I mentioned before, there were a lot of rumors this Google Update has something to do with the encryption via HTTPS – and therefore with Wikipedia. The site is changing to secure connection in these days. While we can’t see an effect of encryption in general, Wikipedia seems to be effected by this Google Update.

In comparison to the week before, the domain wikipedia.org lost nearly 3 percentage points in SEO Visibility. At a first glance, it doesn’t sound that much, but consider the enormous Visibility of this domain.

Let’s try to explain to drop in Wikipedia’s Visibility: The domain’s ranking position for tons of informational keywords is position 1 or 2. Now, when all the news sites got higher ranking due to the Google Update, it’s Wikipedia who missed the wave – and has a drop in Visibility right now.

More Examples for the Newswave

For a lot of general shorthead-keywords we saw the same development in this week’s rankings: Everywhere news sites entered the Top10-rankings. Take the keyword “Kanye West” for example. In the Top 10 you can find 4 new entries, 3 of them didn’t rank for this keyword the week before.

Searchmetrics Keyword Research: Kanye West

 

You want another example? Take „US Open“. Google considers that you obviously meant the golf tournament (which is happening in these days and as yet on position 4 in Google Trends) – and not the tennis challenge. As you can see, 4 out of 10 ranking positions are new entries – these landing pages didn’t rank for US Open the week before.

Searchmetrics Keyword Research: US Open

 

Somehow, in these new volatile search results you can find URLs from news websites, which offer a) old or b) thin content. That’s why our analysis of the Newswave Update is just a first research. I could imagine that Google is still testing & improving the algorithm change in the next days for providing the very best search results.

Could this Update effect my online business?

Google is supposed to consider majorities when semantically finding out what’s the search intent of the users. Indeed, this could be a problem for web-based business models. Consider the US Open, for example: If I provide tennis lessons, or offer pre-booking hospatility packages for the tennis tournament, I will loose rankings and traffic when the golf challenge takes place and Google provides tons of information and URLs just for the golf variation.

Conclusion on the Newswave: Intent, actuality, volatility

  • The Google Newswave Update effects informational shorthead-keywords, whose search results are flooded which news. Because news pages are – besides Wikipedia – Google’s most important source for its search results on current and newsworthy information, those news domains gained a lot in SEO Visibility thanks to this Google Update.
  • One of the most important factors for calculating the user’s search intent (and flooding the SERPs with news content) seems to be actuality. The relaunch of Google Trends, which occurred simultaneously on Wednesday, June, 17th, wasn’t maybe by chance: The real-time search data is for sure now a part of Google’s ranking algorithm as well. In contrast, this actuality is only temporarily – if the news is getting old, the ranking for the affected topic and keywords should also settle down.
  • News are like waves, they come and go. Sometimes they are smaller, sometimes they are overwhelming. But the next (news) wave will come, that’s for sure. Partly, there are keywords affected which do not have any actual reference – and besides that fact, I think that such a huge amount of similar pages ranking for the same topic is a bit exaggerated. That’s why I believe Google is still testing & improving the algorithm change.
  • But in general, the volatility of search results will increase, especially when there are trending news results and/ or a change of the search volume for informational keywords. This could effect online businesses, because the increased volatility in search results could lead to temporarily losses in rankings and traffic.

 

Update: The domain gactv.com has been redirected to greatamericancountry.com, so there seems to be another reason for the drop.

 

Dies ist nur ein Gravatar

Who’s writing this stuff? My name is Marcus Tober and I’m the founder of Searchmetrics. Because we really love to analyze every kind of online data, we can give you more insights than any other company in SEO, SEM and Social Media. It’s not a job, it’s passion. You can find me also on Google+ .
Show all articles from .

Comments (1)

Comments (55)

  1. 2017/03/13

    Marcus, thanks for the information! Each Google update is a challenge for all websites…

Trackbacks (4)

Comments (55)

  1. 2016/01/21

    […] deres algoritmer, kan nævnes HTTPS-opdateringern (dec. 2015), Hacked Page Update (Okt. 2015) og Google News-wave update. (Juni, 2015), for at nævne nogle få på den lange liste af […]

  2. 2016/03/17

    […] deres algoritmer, kan nævnes HTTPS-opdateringern (dec. 2015), Hacked Page Update (Okt. 2015) og Google News-wave update. (Juni, 2015), for at nævne nogle få på den lange liste af […]

  3. 2016/03/17

    […] deres algoritmer, kan nævnes HTTPS-opdateringern (dec. 2015), Hacked Page Update (Okt. 2015) og Google News-wave update. (Juni, 2015), for at nævne nogle få på den lange liste af […]

  4. 2016/03/17

    […] deres algoritmer, kan nævnes HTTPS-opdateringern (dec. 2015), Hacked Page Update (Okt. 2015) og Google News-wave update. (Juni, 2015), for at nævne nogle få på den lange liste af […]

Write a comment